Saturday, January 28, 2017

Investigations Continue


Judicial Watch update on Clinton investigations, Voter fraud & Sanctuary cities  1/28/17
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/voter-fraud-truth/

House Oversight  Committee requests Clinton's back-up-server contents
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/go-house-oversight-committee-sends-request-fbi-director-comey-hillary-clintons-server-contents/

A must watch video for people who do not believe voter fraud exists.  Project Veritas documented examples of on site voter fraud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCldQRaPXwo


 



22 comments:

Anonymous said...

"A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast" Washington Post - August 7, 2014 headline.

Anonymous said...

Judicial Watch is a right wing organization, founded by a right wing activist, to put this report into perspective.

Anonymous said...

Nothing about the protests, refugees, that f-ing wall, but an article about Clinton's email server from a right wing site? That site does not make it fact. If you believe it, then it is not a conspiracy, even if it is seen as one. Clinton is nothing now so WHO CARES? The horse is dead, you can stop beating on it. Doomsday clock moved up, closer then it's been since the cold war, newsworthy. Every leader of every major European country is outraged over the Muslim ban. The Chancellor of Germany had to explain to the POTUS how the Geneva convention worked with refugees. Steve Bannon is running the country with Trump just signing anything and everything, not sure what repercussions are or even the fact that some things just cannot be done, against law, even if you are the POTUS. Resist, resist, resist! All newsworthy and this is the crap on here. Done. won't be back, so there is no need to respond.

Moderator said...


5:18pm President Trump is not suspending visas from countries his team selected, they are simply suspending visa approval from countries President Obama selected. Additionally, Trump is suspending ALL visa applications from those countries – nothing to do with Muslim applications.

In 2013 President Obama suspended refugees from Iraq for six months. In 2015 Congress passed, and Obama signed, a law restricting visas from states of concern; and in 2016 Obama’s DHS, Jeh Johnson, expanded those restrictions. …. all President Trump is doing is taking the same action as Obama 2013, and applying Visa restrictions to the nation states Obama selected in 2015 and 2016. Where was the outrage when Obama took the actions?

Trump has not written any new immigration laws. He merely intends to enforce the ones already on the books.

The left wing is in a frenzy against Trump and a lot of disinformation is being spread. There is big money and organization behind the protests.

Does everyone forget how Bill Clinton was cheered for his immigration policies which sounded a lot like Trump's current policies? Where was the outrage when Hillary Clinton and Obama voted for our current border wall?

Moderator said...

1:12 pm Judicial Watch is the preeminent public interest group specializing in government open records research and litigation. Their motto is "No one is above the law"

Anonymous said...

No, you're wrong. Trump suspended valid visas, causing hundreds of people to be not allowed to into the country when they tried to board planes overseas or landed in the US. That was the cause of this weekend protests.
What a bunch of crap that only harms our country and the values and ideals it proclaims to profess. This was Trump's doing, not Clinton'sor Obama's.

Moderator said...

1:07 pm There is a reason why the Washington Post is not so affectionately called the Washington Compost.
I have read that the Post's liberal basis is better documented than Hillary Clinton's cyber crimes.

Trump is calling for an investigation into our voting system which has been surrounded by controversy for years. No matter what the results, the investigation will lead to a restoration of citizens confidence in the system and could put an end to speculation as in the below statement.

[“Are we supposed to be so naive as to think that tens of millions of people are here, present in the United States, and none of them are illegally voting?” asked Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement.

“In states where you don’t have voter ID, in states with the most voter registration, you’re not required to certify citizenship, other than signing and saying you’re a citizen,” he said.

“It happens repeatedly where you have these voter registrations signed by aliens because they shouldn’t be voting, so they’re registered to vote – and the irony is, once they’re registered to vote, voter ID ain’t gonna protect you, because they have the ID necessary to vote, once they’re registered. So you have many non-citizens voting in elections, and they vote in large numbers in a way to sway elections.”]

Moderator said...

See new Project Veritas video of proven voter fraud added to post.

Anonymous said...

You said you aren't a right wing site, yet you quote rught wing sites, mention the left with disdain and call the Washington Post compost for what you have read is liberal basis. Right wing conspiracy site right here folks.

Moderator said...

8:06pm Green Card holders who are currently out of the country need a case by case wavier to return. They will be let back in after being properly vetted.
The 300+ people who landed here after the order was signed are being vetted and will not be deported if approved.

This a a temporary order for 90 days until new extreme vetting procedures can be formulated.

Moderator said...

10:17pm I didn't make up the name Washington Compost. It's widely known as that for all the liberal articles that have proven to be incorrect.

Pointing out real factual investigations that are occurring is not conspiracy. I've always tried to be bipartisan. Both sides have plenty of faults. I will make the observation that the radical left who are resorting to vulgarity, destruction of property, name calling as a response to any disagreement, and spreading of false information, will be the downfall of the democratic party. Centrist democrats are being appalled and pushed out of the party.

Anonymous said...

Keep drinking the alt right Kool-Aid. Thankfully, your conspiracies are based on "alternate facts" that the majority of Americans reject.
Nothing good will come from this administration. People will suffer and die. The super rich will take more of the nation's wealth, leaving even less for the 99%.
Larry would have been apalled where his blog went. He would have shut it down.

Anonymous said...

If you want to point to vulgarity , name calling and spreading disinformation in politics, you only have to look no further than our current president. Your discreadited statements are nothing more than psychological projection.

Moderator said...

I would suggest that people try to read or listen to different news sources. Don't automatically believe or accept your favorite commentator's opinions. Of course the democratic officials are coming out strongly against him but there are also republicans in high places who have been seen talking with Soros who are working against him.
Trump has been trying to keep the promises he made to his voters in the majority of states. They are happy and his approval rating is rising.
I wish Larry was here to write about present events. It would have been very interesting to read.

Anonymous said...

Trumps most recent approval rating as of four days ago was 34% among Americans. This is a dismal number for someone who is supposed to be the leader of the free world.

Moderator said...

7:48am
Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_jan31

Anonymous said...

Time magazine has described Rasmussen Reports as a "conservative-leaning polling group."[83] The Washington Post called Rasmussen a "polarizing pollster."[84] John Zogby said that Scott Rasmussen has a "conservative constituency."[85] The Center for Public Integrity listed "Scott Rasmussen Inc" as a paid consultant for the 2004 George W. Bush campaign.[86] The Washington Post reported that the 2004 Bush re-election campaign had used a feature on the Rasmussen Reports website that allowed customers to program their own polls, and that Rasmussen asserted that he had not written any of the questions nor assisted Republicans.[65]

Moderator said...

What polling company would you like to be posted?

Anonymous said...

How about Gallup?

Anonymous said...

you are making the point. You choose a reliable source

Moderator said...

10:09 pm The only reason that polling even came up was because the poster at 7:48 am wrote about a 4 day old poll with no sources given. Rasmussen was picked because it was listed as the most comprehensive public opinion poll. Today, Trump's approval rating went up to 53%. Gallop poll has the approval rating listed as 43%.
I did not bring up the polls. We all witnessed now inaccurate and slanted they could be during the last election.

Anonymous said...


Trump, by far, has the worse approval rating and highest disapproval rating for an incoming president in recent history. This is not shocking, considering that Clinton received almost 3 million more votes than he did,
Per Gallup:
Initial Job Approval Ratings of Elected U.S. Presidents
Dates of first poll Approve Disapprove No opinion
% % %
Donald Trump 2017 Jan 20-22 45 45 10
Barack Obama 2009 Jan 21-23 68 12 21
George W. Bush 2001 Feb 1-4 57 25 18
Bill Clinton 1993 Jan 24-26 58 20 22
George H. W. Bush 1989 Jan 24-26 51 6 43
Ronald Reagan 1981 Jan 30-Feb 2 51 13 36
Jimmy Carter 1977 Feb 4-7 66 8 26
Richard Nixon 1969 Jan 23-28 59 5 36
John F. Kennedy 1961 Feb 10-15 72 6 22
Dwight Eisenhower 1953 Feb 1-5 68 7 25